Ministries & Dept of Govt
Govt’s Organizational Structure
- Prez made “The GoI (Allocation of Business) Rules” under Art 77– It stipulates that business of GoI shall be transacted in Min, Depts, Secretariats & Offices specified in its 1st sch
- AoBS forms Basis of structure of GoI– It specifies functional division of work among various Depts—Demarcates their turf to avoid any ambiguity w.r.t R/S
Attached or Subordinate Offices—Under Depts
- For providing executive direction required in policy implementation
- Repository of technical information & advise Dept on tech aspects dealt by them.
- Function as field est for detailed execution of policies
Strengths of the Existing Structure
- Time Tested System—Contributed to nation building + creation of an inclusive state.
- Continuity & Stability— As staffed by permanent C.S has provided continuity & stability—contributed to maturing of our democracy.
- Commitment to Constitution—Political neutrality
- Link b/w policy making & its implementation—Govt’s framework has facilitated a staffing pattern which promotes such link
- A national outlook amongst public functionaries—National integration.
Weaknesses of the Existing Structure
- Proliferation of Ministries/Depts—weak integration & co-ord– Fragmented Gov & silo mentality
- Undue emphasis on routine functions—Less focus on policy analysis & policy making
- Rigid hierarchy with too many levels / Multi-layered structure—leads to
- Delays in D.M
- Absence of team work
- Fragmentation of functions
- Diffused A/C.
Way—2nd ARC
- Subjects which are closely inter-related should be dealt with together—A golden mean b/w Need for functional specialization & adoption of an integrated approach should be adopted.
- Separation of policy-making functions from execution—Ministries should give more emphasis on policy-making & delegate implementation to operational units—Bcz policy-making today is a specialized function, which requires a broader perspective, domain expertise while Implementation require in-depth knowledge of subject & managerial skills.
- Coordinated implementation—Proliferation of vertical Dept makes this impossible
- Flatter structures—↓ No. of levels + encourage team work—Structure of org should be tailor-made to suit specific objectives—Conventional approach is to adopt uniform vertical hierarchies.
- Well defined accountability—Clearer demarcation of R/S help in developing a performance Mgt system
- Appropriate delegation—Principle of subsidiarity
- Criticality of operational units—Rationalize Govt staff pattern
Conclusion
Inter-disciplinary approach needed to respond effectively to emerging challenges.
Proliferation of Ministries & Departments / Size of cabinet should be big as governmental work justifies & as big PM can manage as a team. How far is the efficacy of Govt inversely related to size of cabinet? Discuss.
As Cabinet is the Nerve centre of GoI— It should be framed a/c to requirement—Optimum size
Advantages of large cabinet
- Functional specialization, focus & resource channelization—To achieve welfare objectives
- Meet Political compulsions—Coalition
- Reflects needs of Rep democracy for a diverse country like India.
Disadvantages of Large cabinet / CoM
- Not conducive for healthy Democracy— More no. of Minister—Less A/C of Govt
- Overlap of duties, Lack of co-ord—Turf War
- Inability to adopt an integrated approach to National priorities & problems.
- Fragmentation of functions
Ex—Diff aspects of transport are dealt by diff Ministries—
- MoCA—Civil aviation;
- Ministry of Railways—Rail transport
- Min of Shipping
- Min of Road Transport & Highways
- MoUD— Urban transport systems
Advantages of mid-size / Compact cabinet
- Less burden on Public Exchequer
- Better co-ord + Integrated approach—Team work
- Splitting of & equal sharing of R/S
Disadvantages of small/gigantic cabinet
- Excessive centralisation of power
- Excessive burden
- conflict of interest
- Overlapping of duties
PM being leader of Govt need compact cabinet to steer members in a more precise manner
Pragmatic approach
Integrated national approach very imp—Ex—to Implement proposed NCMC or Integrated travelling card
Way—Need to strike a balance b/w requirements of functional specialization & need for a holistic approach.
Thus to evolve an integrated approach—
- Categorize functions of Govt into a reasonable no. of groups—DRSCs are good ex of integration of inter-connected subject matters—Will enable Govt to streamline ministries & Dept and retaining only those which have direct relevance for core governance functions.
- Adequate delegation & division of work
- Office of cabinet secretary be used with greater efficiency
- Committee of secretaries is a good platform for Inter-ministerial co-ord.
It would lead to enhanced co-ord & adequate Ministerial Rep in a large & diverse country, w/o causing a proliferation.